Our Divided States

2020 Electoral Map

Kanika Magee is the Assistant Dean for Student Affairs and the Special Assistant for Interfaith Programming at Howard University, a leading HBCU in Washington D.C., and a 2020 Interfaith America Racial Equity Fellow.

 

Red. Blue. White. Democrat. Republican. Independent. Socialist. South. North. West. East. Protester. Rioter. Freedom Fighter. American. Voter. What are we really trying to say?

Interfaith. Multifaith. Faith Diversity. Faith Neutral. Faith Nonconforming. What are we really trying to say?

Today we want everyone to accept the freedom of faith choice yet in accepting this freedom we are overtly diminishing those we call extremists: those who are deeply invested in and tied to a specific belief system that doesn’t allow room for the beliefs of others to be different from their own. Today we want to proclaim unity and forge ahead as a United States, when around half of us voted on opposites sides of the polls: 71.5 million of us voted for one and 76 million for another. This is my struggle. I want to believe that I am open to and accepting of diversity of belief and expression at its fullness – yet in our expression and opening of inclusive space, we have closed a door and ensured there is little to no room left for them.

In a religious context, “them” is the extremists, the Crusaders, those who espouse holy wars, they who justify slavery and genocide in the name of a higher power, the ones who interfere with our ability to worship in peace and safety. In race, “them” is the skinheads, the KKK, perhaps the Proud Boys…or for those who don’t believe as I do, the #BLM protesters. For gender, “them” refuses to acknowledge gender pronouns, or (heterosexual) male privilege, or learn what LGBTQ+ or LGBTQIA stands for. In politics, “them” is conservatives or liberals, Democrats or Republicans.  Am I really comfortable with a diversity that creates and protects the same space for those who promote fear, bigotry, and hatred as for those who espouse equality, justice, and humanity? Do I really want “them” to live in the same neighborhood, ride the same bus or carpool, attend the same school, and work in the same place as me, my friends and those I love most? Do I really want to be assigned to a project or team, to be invited to a game or happy hour with “them”? Would I really be okay if my child brought one of “them” home for dinner? While my refined response may differ, my most guttural and true response is no.

Truth be told, I’m okay with this – but I also have to reconcile within myself the hypocrisy of this. Because our beliefs are often so divided, I must clarify, I am not suggesting acceptance or protection of the freedom to murder, threaten, or physically harm someone in the name of a belief system or ideology.  I am tempted in this moment to take the easy retort that “they” would have rejected me – my presence in their neighborhood, on their bus, in their school, etc. – anyway. I am also reminded of the warning that “they” want to destroy me, so my attempt to recognize their humanity could be my inadvertent acquiescence to their death warrant for me and my kind. But I am willing to acknowledge that perhaps I am not as open and accepting as I want “them” to be. For I want to destroy their belief just as vehemently as they want to destroy mine – our tactics are different, our endpoint different, but our rejection of the other is the same. When I acknowledge my own hypocrisy, I am able to accept that, to those I call extreme, I may appear equally extreme; to those by whom I feel threatened, I may appear equally as threatening. So, just as this Christian girl from a Catholic city in a red state in the U.S. has evolved to understand and accept Islam, Judaism, Sikhism, Buddhism, and others; I too am evolving to accept radical, right wing, left wing, evangelical…and the list goes on.

This is my struggle – my journey. For faith, for religion, for race, for culture. For I must somehow learn to honor and accept those for whom #BLM is an abomination. I must learn to somehow accept and respect those who believe in racial segregation and inferiority, in American superiority, and who sometimes use the Bible I believe in to justify beliefs I believe are bigotry and against God. I must learn to reconcile each of my identities – as a heterosexual, African-American, female, not just ordinary Methodist but AME (African Methodist Episcopal), adoptive mother, only child (not spoiled), university professor, administrator, and now wife and step-mother. I must find a space within me that opens a space for others – some of whom I understand and many whom I never will – and be willing to live in the mystery that is constant discovery. I must be willing to speak with and hear those whose opinions and beliefs make me cringe and yet still open my ears, my heart, and my life to truly hear them and to see them in their humanity…Let the journey continue.

 

 

#Interfaith is a self-paced, online learning opportunity designed to equip a new generation of leaders with the awareness and skills to promote interfaith cooperation online. The curriculum is free to Interfaith America readers; please use the scholarship code #Interfaith100. #Interfaith is presented by IFYC in collaboration with ReligionAndPublicLife.org.

 

more from IFYC

Lessons from Thich Nhat Hanh, the person who nominated Martin Luther King Jr. for the Nobel Peace Prize and encouraged King to speak out against the war in Vietnam.
What Vietnamese Zen Buddhist monk and activist Thich Nhat Hanh taught me about the power of mindful breathing through art.
A scholar of democratic virtues explains why Dominican monk Thomas Aquinas’ thoughts on hope are relevant today.
From covering spirituality in Silicon Valley to writing an online newsletter about her own journey to Judaism, reporter Nellie Bowles keeps finding innovative ways to reflect on religion and technology.
Six ways religious and spiritual leaders can help the internet serve their communities right now.
At the request of his editors at Religion News Service, Omar Suleiman writes about waiting with hostages’ families.
Regardless of what happens on Capitol Hill, the PNBC leaders said they plan to lobby Congress in March and register voters weekly in their congregations and communities.
King’s exasperation at self-satisfied white Christians holds up a mirror that is still painfully accurate today.
A day before the U.S. Senate was expected to take up significant legislation on voting rights that is looking likely to fail, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s eldest son condemned federal lawmakers over their inaction.
The congregation’s rabbi, Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, is particularly well connected to the larger interfaith community and on good terms with many Muslim leaders.
For Martin Luther King Day, an interfaith panel reflects on the sacredness of the vote and the legacy of Reverend King.
In his new book, Princeton historian Julian E. Zelizer reexamines the life of Abraham Joshua Heschel and finds lessons for interfaith political activism today.
King drew criticism from Billy Graham, who told journalists that he thought King was wrong to link anti-war efforts with the civil rights movement.
Some are calling out historical injustices the church has carried out against Native Americans, even as others find their faith empowering.
IFYC’s Vote is Sacred campaign launched on January 13. Faith leaders, public intellectuals, activists, and organizers are joining to advocate for an inclusive, nonpartisan interfaith approach to restoring and protecting our democracy.
One out of five Muslims is in an interfaith relationship, surveys suggest. But few imams are willing to conform the traditional Muslim wedding ceremony to their needs, couples say.
In her popular podcast series, Corrigan invites guests to wonder about 'the elephant in America's living room': belief and religion. 'I hope I have a hundred more conversations like these in 2022 and beyond,' she says.
In his annual address to the Vatican's diplomatic corps, the pope stressed the individual's responsibility 'to care for ourself and our health, and this translates into respect for the health of those around us.'
The very people who have been subject to the worst of the United States have embodied its best.
The Jan. 6 insurrection of the U.S. Capitol drew recent attention to the phenomenon of Christian nationalism, but religious and spiritual leaders acknowledge its existence long before that.
A new interfaith curriculum designed for Christian universities and seminaries recently got a test run. One professor who tried it says it's opened hearts and minds: "The desire is very much there."

The opinions contained in this piece are solely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interfaith Youth Core. Interfaith America encourages a wide range of views and strives to maintain a respectful tone with a goal of greater understanding and cooperation between people of different faiths, worldviews, and traditions.